Kathryn Moyles Building Innovation is another example of some provocative issue papers already emerging this year. The paper explores national and international policy priorities for building students’ innovation capabilities through information and communication technologies (ICT) in Australian schools. Importantly it helps contextualise key current initiatives such as the Digital and Building Education revolution and National Curriculum and the Australian Govs Innovation Agenda. Inevitably tensions will exist between some of these policies, as they attempt to introduce innovatory practice into a rigid system of assessment and uniform traditional knowledge transfer. How do teachers/educators make sense of the competing interests and try to juggle competing those expressed in the new policy frameworks? Moyle rightly points out that many of the cries for education reform are driven by economic determinism- and not so much for the inherent benefit of ‘innovative scholarship’. Market influences are key drivers in positioning ICT in education, and of course are not neutral. Moyle claims that Australia’s heavy reliance on proprietary software for example, is at odds with the rest of the world. While these are important themes, if we accept Moyle’s assertion that “the economic roles of schools have been elevated to levels of pre-eminence over all other purposes of education” it perhaps needs to be seen as a general community desire (maybe fueled by the GFC) and not just a political and commercial agenda. Certainly IT is not neutral and can influence how teachers and students frame their learning, but I would argue that the dominance of major proprietary software types such as Microsoft or Adobe not restrict learning opportunities- but rather given their variety and ubiquitous nature, ensure students engage with real industry standard tools. Open source applications while initially attractive in terms of cost, often have a long sting in the tail in terms of support, adaptability, and uncertainty of licensing terms of conditions. Our recent experience in developing social networking tools highlights the dilemma between going it alone and engineering a tool with all the bells and whistles demanded by teachers and students, to perhaps ‘compromising’ on the functionality, for a tool we can ensure is going to be supported by a larger community of interest into the future. Perhaps this is also a point of difference where its important not to generalise in terms of proprietary V opensource, but instead debate the technologies in terms of their use. For instance, social networking technologies may be better from opensource communities, but publishing tools and enterprise systems are best provided by the dominant proprietary vendors. The critical aspect to all this is that the exposure of ICT in the classroom needs to reflect the real world, and currently I think NSW DET is mindful of the virtues of both. Moyle’s position that open environments are more economically viable and pedagogically sound needs to be challenged.
Tim’s Blog
Recent Comments
thand on The Decisive moment Ian on The real barrier to IT ad… Slamdunk on Returning to the blog ZaidLearn on Returning to the blog johns220 on PLE Tims Tag Cloud
access blogging Blogs Commentries Communities digital natives education eLearning ePortfolio Informal learning information organising innovation Internet safety knowledge Leadership literacies LMS Net Gen open content Opensource platform PLE professional development Public schools schooling Social networking standards Uncategorized Web2 WikisPast Posts
- March 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- November 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
Access
My Twitters
Tweets by thand1Stephen Downes
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
JISC
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Will Richardsons blog
- 10 Essay Writing Tips Every College Students Should Know
- Mastering The Art of Thesis Statement
- Choosing a Major: Passion or Financial Practicality?
- Finding a True Friendship in College
- Renting Off-Campus. Part 2: What You Should Know About Subletting
- Renting Off-Campus. Part 1: Budgeting and Hidden Expenses
- Tips on Creating a Stress-Free Study Environment
- Social Benefits of Joining College Clubs and Organizations
- End of Semester: Reflecting, Analyzing, and Setting Goals
- Budget-Friendly Winter Holidays Activities
EduBlogs
- To look forward, don’t beat a retreat
- Ewan's latest writing on Medium
- How do you nudge teachers into online coaching? 2016 in Travel
- MONO Decision-making: Minimum Oblique Non-Obvious
- Ten years on from the very first unconference for educators: TeachMeet is 10
- Don't be scared. Ne sois pas effrayé
- 2015 Travel: Han Solo could do it in 878 milliseconds
- It's high time for designers to get out of the way of design thinking
- The psychological effect of the internet...
- Teachers make meaningful, pragmatic strategy for learning
Tony Karrer
Graham Attwell
- Fachtagung „Digitalisierung als Herausforderung und Chance – neue Ansätze der Lernortkooperation (LoK) für die duale Ausbildung“
- Pontydysgu in Europe
- This is what LinkedIn algorithm thinks about my ‘accomplishments’
- People and Machines
- 25 years working with Graham Attwell – networking, social media and new challenges
- Remembering Stavros Stavrou, former Deputy Director of Cedefop
- Critical digital pedagogy after covid 19 – reflections on teaching through the screen
- Using Labour Market Information for Career Development in the Changing World of Work
- Keynote presentations released as Open Educational Resources
- LinkedIn says growing job demand for growth hackers!
Blogroll
- Alan Levine
- Albert Ip
- Anecdote
- Chris O’neal
- Clarence Fisher
- Clark Quinn
- Clutter Museum
- Dan Haesler
- Daniel Livingstone
- Dave Delgado
- Daves education blog
- Dereks blog
- Digital Chalkie
- educause
- eFoundations
- Eric Duval
- Ewan McIntosh
- George Siemens
- Graham Attwell
- Graham Wegner
- Growing changing learning
- Ian Delaney
- Jay Cross
- Jerry’s Work Blog
- John Connell
- John Travers
- Josie Fraser
- Judy O’Connell
- Leigh Blackall
- Marg Oconnell
- Mark Pesce
- Mccrindle
- Michael Feldstein
- Michelle Martin
- Nancy White
- Ouseful
- Publishing 2
- Ray Sims
- Read Write Web
- Ron Lubensky
- Ross Dawson
- Scott Wilson
- Seb Chan
- Social Software
- Stephens Half an Hour
- Stephens Web
- Teachers teaching teachers
- Teaching Hacks
- Tessa Watson
- The virtual classroom
- Tim O’Reilly
- Tom Cotton
- Tom Haskins
- Tony Searl
- User Interface blog
- William Kamkwamba
- Wolfgang Greller
- ZaidLearn
Blogs
Commentries
Teacher
EDUNews
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Past Papers
Tim's Deli
Flickr Photos
Blog Stats
- 28,351 hits
-
Events
April 2010 M T W T F S S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 My Twitter
I will read the paper and comment later in the week. Thanks Tim!
The problem for me in using propriety software in education is that too much emphasis is sometimes placed on learnng a particular version of the software at the expense of understanding the underlying principles. We only have to consider the reaction to Microsoft’s introduction of the Ribbon. If learners are exposed and expected to use and explore different tools for different purposes this may encourage flexibility and adaptability as the ICT landscape shifts. After all learners are coping with using different types of user interfaces in the social software and mobile technologies in a rapidly changing environment.
Agree with the need for adaptability-Kevin. But if we take the NSW DETs Enterprise suite of Adobe and MS, there is already and overlap in a competing space. When there are limited resources to support applications and money for licensing- there needs to be a tilt towards what needs to be provided as core tools and what the rest of the field requires (niche apps). The changing landscape of open apps also is critical as the recent decision of Ning to charge for its se services shows.
Interesting debating point however probably a moot point now that NSW has already decided the path it wants to follow. As a point of comparison it is interesting to view the video attached to this blog post at Mashable http://mashable.com/2010/04/28/schools-google-apps/
Different scale, similar intent and a slightly different approach via the use of Google docs with Apple laptops.
You’re right Ian- we are locked in currently for the release of the current tools. The Google Apps was certainly an alternate path here- interestng that the cost factor is first consideration (even in the US) for adoption, something that became a theme in any discussion rexcently with the visiting CIO of Miame Daide.