Yesterdays seminar What does C21 learning look like? – interesting day with Mark Pesce doing a great job of hosting what could be argued to be an event dominated by vendor interests. This was the formal agenda but thanks to an undercurrent in the twitter back channel, a parallel commentary was running. Mark & Gary Putland tried to bring the channel into the mainstream conference. This is becoming an emerging aspect to the conference format– with the informal chat running ‘underneath’ – both with conference attendees and those outside. But maybe at the end of the day its the more potent discourse. Provided some tweets below which captured the undercurrent. Must get an IPhone…
|
deangroom: RT @morry_tweet: #edausem – disappointing day with regd to content. I was a twitter skeptic…after yesterday..i’m converted
|
mikecogh: @roseg yeh – amazing how often and easily we revert to students being Gen Y and Z. They are just part of the story. #edausem |
|
MrsAngell: RT @marlenemanto: #edausem “Being in school is like being in a plane…unconnected, silent & staring ahead for long periods.” LOL <-a worry |
sridgway: #edausem being in an aeroplane isolated from your networks all sitting on rows … sounds like a DET NSW classroom to me :>
|
kerryank: @deangroom why not let them use open source tools and not get tied to proprietary tools? #edausem |
|
dbullen: #edausem thinking that this panel should be the other way around – industry should be listening to educators |
|
dbullen: RT @heyjudeonline #edausem duty of care not about firewalls + walled gardens – its about helping kids be good creative citizens of the world |
|
mpesce: @mikecogh I’m hoping that’s (at least in part) because we did our best to get the backchannel into the mix at #edausem |
|
katharinagerste: #edausem Thanks all for today … the tweeting made the day much easier to sit through! Bit disappointed that VET wasn’t talked about more. |
|
fang: Smiling wryly at the ‘Vendor bashing’ running thru #edausem – you are a hard lot to please !! 😉 |
|
Mark nailed it saying change is about information and power, are educators willing to let go of control? #edausem
|
BolshieTeacher: #edausem Perhaps we r being prevented frm achieving 21stC teach by vendors hijacking the agenda in the name of producing life long consumers |
|
mollybob: RT @AnneBB #edausem gen z & gen y are sooo tech savvy.. frm TElstra [really? this is a myth – and has been proven extensively!] |
About thand
I'm a currently working at NSW Departrment of Education & Training, Connected Classrooms Program, Sydney.
Hi Tim,
Back channels are great. Here’s one of the recent ‘Leading a Digital School’ conference
http://twitter.com/#search?q=%23iwbnet09
and a fledgling attempt from our recent annual DP conference in the Hunter Valley:
http://twitter.com/#search?q=%23DPconf09
We are setting up a back channel for ETA conference next term too.
Darcy- I guess the challenge is 1. firstly recognising the validity of the backchannel and 2. how to blend it with the mainstream conference proceedings. certainly beats conference surveys!
Hi Tim
I’m sure the live event was great and the enthusiasm shows via the back channel HOWEVER I’m reading it without context (the Ustream link is failing to load) and it reads like an attack of the twittering class!
Most Twitter posts read like chat. Chat has its place as an artifact offering some contextual colour to an event but it is rare to find a gem amid the dross. Hmmn maybe I did get out of bed on the wrong side today….is that worthy of Twitter?
Ian not a fan of the Tweet I think. Its a good tool for polling commentries as recently taking hold in Fed Parliament during question time. Thats a new democratic device-soon to be clamped down on I’d suspect…
It is not Twitter per se that I have a problem with, merely the Twitterisation of public discourse and the surrounding hype. It is another version of “sound bite” reductionism.
As well you know, different tools for different actions and it doesn’t offer too much to me at present. That said, I can think of a few educational uses for it and now I can add polling tool to the list. And your comment about the iPhone is relevant too as a portable easy-to-use input device makes this tool just that much more embedded.
Some additional thoughts/links in regard to microblogging/Twitter:
The main advantages cited by various pundits are that it is speedy, open and dialogue-based –
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_rise_of_twitter_as_a_platform_for_serious_discourse.php
While these are pluses in regard to its use as an adjunct to news media perhaps in education we could use a little more contemplation, clarity of thought and synthesis. I guess I am swimming (no make that dogpaddling) against the tide though when you see the volume of discussion about it as a tool – start here:
http://mashable.com/guidebook/twitter/
Still looking for ideas about what C21st teaching will look like…. then check out this page from the Web 2.0 tools conference site from the Professional Teaching Council
http://sites.google.com/site/ptcweb2/agenda
This site starts from the question:What IS 21st century pedagogy? It then examines the role of professional associations and how they might utilise social software.
Nice to see that someone from within the PTC is thinking about how real professional learning communities can augment pedagogic practice.